July 18, 2012
-
You didn’t Build this! *updated with new pics hourly*
Obama is the single most self-absorbed and disrespectful person on the face of the earth.
Any fellow business owners as pissed as I am right now?
Here’s the quote:
“You know, there are a lot of wealthy, successful Americans whoagree with me, because they want to give something back, They know they didn’t — look, if you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own. You didn’t get there on your own. I’m always struck by people who think, well, it must be because I was just so smart, There are a lot of smart people out there.”
Are you kidding me???
Comments (97)
I f*ckin’ loved that. I’m the daughter of two people who grew up poor and built a business without harming anybody. What can you even say?
Don Watkins did a post about Obama’s comments that took a quote from Atlas Shrugged. (I’m sure you know the plot line, but I’ll paraphrase for those who don’t.) Dagny’s evil brother James is annoyed with Hank, a businessman who has developed a new metal cheaper and stronger than steel, and has named it after himself. James says (like Obama), that it’s not really HIS metal, he didn’t invent iron ore and blasting furnaces, those things have always been there. Dagny points out that the iron ore and blasting furnaces have been there for everyone to have access to… so why didn’t someone else make that metal? The roads and bridges are there, for everyone. It’s a sorry person who sees a person make something successful and points out that the building blocks were already there. Not only do they not understand the nature of progress, they’re also saying that even though all those building blocks were there, they haven’t done shit with themselves like a businessman has.
A note to Mr Obama.And your work to become president would not have happened if it weren’t for everyone else….. So lets use your logic on your on self!!!!!!
that quote is not the entirety of what the President said. i believe it’s the portion FOX news idiots used to take what he said out of context. Obama was talking about building the America we really upon to be able to build our businesses. he was talking about schools and universities we attended to learn so that we can be productive and build businesses.. he was talking about roads and highways we drive on every day, infrastructure and police and firefighters whose salaries we all pitch in to pay. so no. when i built my business i didn’t build the schools i attended that gave me the education i needed to build it nor the subway system, airports and highways i needed to do business related travel and that is what he was talking about.
in fact in my opinion it is people like Romney and Trump, both of whom who have said they didn’t even get help from their fathers when they started their businesses. as one person put it, Romney likes to tell people he hit a triple when in fact he was born on third base. no help from their fathers? who raised them and gave them everything they needed and probably most everything they wanted?
@TheSutraDude - YES. Thank you…I am glad I am not the only one that disagreed with this “humor” especially since the message I came away with was one of humility:
A successful person ought remember the people or communities that helped them to success and be grateful, not arrogant about their achievements and act accordingly by giving back to those communities in need of support in turn.
To take a message and twist it like this is not humorous…it is ignorant.
@imTHEmeowMIXcat - it is ignorant and it is deceitful politicking. ironically i watched Romney give a speech in the last hour. in his speech he said almost exactly the same things President Obama said, that we need to appreciate teachers, etc. and he was cheered for it by his crowd. still, i recall a speech he gave in which Romney said (i’m paraphrasing) “Obama wants to hire more police, more firefighters and more teachers. it’s time the government stops spending and starts doing something for Americans.” what does Romney think police, firefighters and teachers are, Chinese?
and you’re welcome. thank you
Business owners are scum of the earth. You’re pimps, that’s what you are. You get wealthy off the fruits of OUR labor. I hope the President will do the right thing during his 2nd terms and finally put business under control of the government. Then y’all have to learn what it’s like to actually work for your pay like the rest of us.
Lame…not at all what was meant. You didn’t do it all by yourself is what he meant. I would love to see how your dumbass/dishonest as would fair if you were born in Somalia, North Korea, etc etc etc…
@TheSutraDude - bullshit. 100% bullshit. I read the context myself and he not only meant it, he dug his heels in and repeated himself. The guy honestly believes that I need to split whatever I’ve earned with everyone else.
If I earn more than you I don’t owe you a damn thing, likewise if you earn more than me.
I am building my small business myself, struggling and pushing to make it work. If I make millions I will do my best to keep that reward for MY GODDAMN WORK. If I fail I will try something else.
So fuck you and anyone who defends this bastard who believes my business is the sum total of other peoples work.
@tendollar4ways - @imTHEmeowMIXcat - see above.
@TheSutraDude - “ironically i watched Romney…”
I don’t support Romney either… why would you even bring that up?
@justfinethanku - i brought it up because it’s FOX and the Romney campaign that took that paragraph spoken by President Obama out of context and in an attempt to distort the message Obama was pushing.
@justfinethanku - Obama’s message was and is we are one nation and this nation became great because people worked together, gave back when they were successful and we all pay our fair share.
As I said….if this was Somalia and after you built your business I would simply come along and shoot you and take all $$$ cuz government is for sukkkas.
@TheSutraDude - Everyone benefits from roads and teachers. So Obama was merely stating the obvious.
However, successful people do work smarter, harder, and more creatively than other people.
And Obama explicitly denied that.
And the reason he denied the obvious is because he was stating the fundamental principal of Communism:
That everyone’s achievements are community property.
@justfinethanku - Help your community by supporting charities, donate time and resources to worthy causes. Mentor others and provide a good model of success. These are all ways to “give back” …you are acting as though someone has suggested stealing something from you!
With all the modern conveniences such as education, and transport since roads and teachers were mentioned, what is wrong with taking a step back from one’s personal sphere and appreciate the work of others that do their part just like you on a daily basis?
Also, I don’t believe I deserve being told any exfpletive words by you or anyone. If you disagree with me fine, but don’t demean us both in the process…
@tendollar4ways - Sounds good to me. If they ain’t gonna give back, we need to take it by force. This jackass thinks he’s above it all just cuz he started a business. Anybody can sit back and collect profits.There’d be no profits to collect though if it wasn’t for us. That business belongs just as much to us working people as it does his ignorant, greedy, bloated ass.
@SKANLYN - With any luck, America will soon look like Somalia and we can just go take Fatboys business…..Fuck Da Police I have always said…..We got it bad cuz we is brown.
@tendollar4ways - Whaddya mean his business? I consider it my business and your business and that of anyone else living in this democracy.
@TheSutraDude - This is the full quote but I really don’t see how anything was taken out of context. The message remains the same.
“PRESIDENT OBAMA: There are a lot of wealthy, successful Americans who agree with me because they want to give something back. They know they didn’t — if you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own. You didn’t get there on your own. I am always struck by people who think, “It must be because I was just so smart.” There are a lot of smart people out there. “It must be because I worked harder than everybody else.” Let me tell you something: There are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there. If you are successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business, you did not build that–somebody else made that happen. The Internet did not get invented on its own. Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off of the Internet. The point is that when we succeed, we succeed because of our individual initiative, but also because we do things together.”
Beside the obvious mistake about the internet (no, the internet was not created with the intent to be used by companies to make money. That came later) his whole comment presumes that business owners are stuck up and believe that their success is dependent solely on themselves. Which is not true of the vast majority of us.
Sure, we have to be creative and make smart decisions to help our businesses thrive. Bad decisions or dumb ones result in business failure. When we succeed, most of us will tell you it comes from luck, the support of our families, and good employees. Does that mean we didn’t build our businesses? No. We still had to take the risks, stick our money and our necks out there, and put a business together. If businesses were so simply created by a collective, as President Obama is implying, everyone would own a business because we’d all be building businesses for one another. But it doesn’t work like that because we’re not a socialist collective.
@SKANLYN - How about you start a business. Then we’ll talk.
This from the man who wanted credit for what NAVY SEALS did with Bin Laden. Not very different.
@firetyger - Unfortunately I wasn’t born into a life of privilege so I don’t get to start a business.
President Obama:”… The point is that when we succeed, we succeed because of our individual initiative, but also because we do things together.”
Old way: our success comes from God.
New way: we succeed because of us.
Progress… or something.
@firetyger - i agree with what you say but this is also what Obama said and has been saying all along. Obama has on many occasions praised business owners and successful people for innovation and hard work. he said it’s what makes America great, that America gives people the opportunities to succeed. you have to put this in the overall context, a battle between Obama and Romney, a man who said Obama wants to hire more police, firefighters and teachers rather than doing something for Americans. i don’t know where you live or what things are like there but everywhere i’ve lived police, firefighters and teachers are Americans and very patriotic Americans at that not to mention what they do for us every day.
i worked for nearly 8 years at Lehman Brothers and i remember vividly when the firm began outsourcing because my wife (who also worked there) and i were asked to secretly put together the graphic proposals to outsource jobs to India. they wanted us to do the work because we were good but more because we were a married couple who between us covered the entire week. they also trusted us to keep the secret between us. when i said i wouldn’t do it i was told by the vice president of Lehman’s global computer graphics that the presentations were meant to show outsourcing would not make sense at which point i said ok. it turned out i had been duped. outsourcing happened in wave upon wave. i saw colleagues disappear, unannounced. our own department was gutted. those of us left and some whose jobs were outsourced had to train people from India before they lost their jobs to the people they trained. then this happened. an assistant vice president called us into a meeting to tell us how great the outsourcing program would be and he thanked my wife and i for working on the project. i was livid. i stormed into his office after the meeting and told him never to do that again. we were lied to about the intent and now we were heralded in front of our colleagues as part of the reason they were pissed off.
how did outsourcing work out for Lehman Brothers? it turned into a money loser because over 80% of the work that India did had to be corrected or done over entirely but us but guess what. at the end of the first year of outsourcing the CEO got a $5 million dollar jump in his year end bonus based on the perception he’d saved the firm money by outsourcing. the top execs also got huge jumps in their bonuses for the same reason. in several years, for other reasons, Lehman Brothers became the biggest bankruptcy in U.S. history. October 14th, 2008. it marked the official day of the economic collapse.
i could go on about decent, honest, hardworking people vs. people who don’t work hard but get promoted in the corporate world for ass-kissing. it happens all the time. my point is that just because someone is a business lead and Dick Fuld, CEO of Lehman was one of the biggest does not mean they are job creators nor good for America.
Obama has been trying to cut taxes and has some for small business owners but he’s been opposed at every turn by filibustering republicans. FOX and congressional republicans have been spreading the myth that healthcare reform will cost small businesses money when in fact many small business owners have come forward to say their employee healthcare costs have stopped rising by 16% a year, leveled out and in some cases the cost has dropped in the past year.
Obama’s tax plan raises taxes for those making over $250,000/year but does not raise taxes on their first $250,000. another plan he proposed would have raised taxes on people making over a million a year not on their first million. at the same time it lowers taxes on the middle class. in fact right now under Obama we are collectively paying the lowest tax rates in over 30 years. i’m sick and tired of FOX and congressional republicans lying to the American people.
and several years ago Frank Luntz, the guy who scripts republican talking points, told republicans in Congress if democrats are ever allowed to pass a healthcare reform bill it will be a disaster for republicans because democrats will be in power for a long time. thus all the propaganda about “pulling the plug on grandma” and raising taxes on small businesses. the individual mandate was originally a republican idea. it came out of the Heritage Foundation and it’s purpose was and is to keep people who can afford health insurance from freeloading. when someone goes to the emergency room for the flu or for being in an accident and they don’t have insurance the rest of us pay for their care and emergency room care is the most expensive cost in healthcare. but today the individual mandate (personal responsibility) is a dirty word among republicans. go back to Frank Luntz on that one.
the internet was invented in a university and first used by the military. it was at the time called Telnet. a friend of mine, a covert operative who took the time to teach me how to use a computer showed me how to access Telnet. by that time it was no longer used by the military. it was or is if it still exists a DOS program. he and i sometimes communicated over Telnet just for fun. would Bill Gates be as wealthy as he is without the government subsidized invention of the internet? maybe. the thing is Bill Gates gives back to the community and the world and has said he is all for paying more in taxes. he realizes he is part of the world and the world and America has been good to him. Kudos to him. i have tremendous respect for him. and unlike republicans in Congress who have the best healthcare (single payer) in the U.S., who are paid by every day by Americans and who get great perks also paid for by us don’t want us to have the same, President Obama says again and again people like himself should pay a little more in taxes to help this country. i don’t see anything wrong with that.
Romney? his company, while he still led it, helped outsource jobs to China and other countries.
@mtngirlsouth - actually that is how FOX and congressional republicans framed it. the truth is Obama gave tremendous credit for the operation to get Bin Laden. people in the know however understand Obama made one of the gutsiest calls in trusting the Navy Seal team instead of doing what even Biden advised him to do which was use a drone to take out the complex. so many things could have gone wrong for the Seals who helicoptered across Pakistan undetected to the complex. Obama made that decision so we could have proof Bin Laden was captured or killed and have closure for those who lost loved ones on 9/11. he also made that decision because with a drone attack innocent citizens in the area would have likely been killed. maybe you don’t remember what happened when Jimmy Carter ordered a team to go by helicopter into Iran to rescue American hostages. it was a disaster and Carter paid politically and dearly for it even though it was not his fault. Obama was reminded of this by his staff but he made his decision anyway for the reasons i stated. it’s a travesty that republicans refused to give him any credit because i remember how they blamed Carter when things didn’t work out.
the Navy Seals who completed the mission apparently feel differently from the FOX news crew and congressional republicans. they presented Obama with a piece they took from the compound and it is in the White House. Obama never made a big dance about getting Bin Laden. there was no “Mission Accomplished” banner hanging anywhere but here’s the thing. Bush went from standing at the site of 9/11 (where i was on that morning, working) and promised to get the people who did this to “I’m not really concerned about Bin Laden”. Obama went from saying on his campaign from “I will get Bin Laden” to getting Bin Laden. i don’t blame Bush for 9/11 nor for not getting Bin Laden although it is strange that Rumsfeld ordered a special forces team to stand down, allowing Bin Laden to escape into Pakistan. i do believe that Obama should get some credit for making the decision to send Navy Seals to get Bin Laden and to get proof that we got him. John Brennan who served under Clinton and Bush administrations agrees. he called the decision one of the gutsiest calls of any President in recent history.
@TheSutraDude - From everything I’ve ever read you say, I truly believe Obama could do absolutely anything and you could come up with some way that it was a benevolent and excellent decision for the benefit of all of us.
@mtngirlsouth - and from everything i’ve ever heard you say Obama could come up with the cure to cancer and you’d blame him for it as being bad for business or some other shit but don’t ask me about the taking out of Bin Laden. ask John Brennan and several others who were involved or not involved but who have been involved in national security.
@mtngirlsouth - but thank you for making my point to this point. Obama is the Commander in Chief but without the Navy Seals, trained to the max, we would not have taken out Bin Laden. Obama has said the same many times and he gave the credit to the Navy Seals. it’s the same in business. i worked on special projects which Dick Fuld, CEO of Lehman Brothers signed off on. he could never have done the work i did. thank you
and btw. i’ve been very critical of President Obama, mostly for trying to reach across party lines in good faith when the other side had no intention of reaching back
@TheSutraDude - Actually, I *didn’t* ask you. I *wouldn’t* ask you because I could get the same thing from any one of your accepted news sources that tell you how to think and you eat it up. That’s why I stick to reality. And as to the first part of your statement, well, this only shows how narrow – and possibly simple – minded you are. Unlike you, I am not driven by party lines, nor do I think I have the right to force others to adhere to my version of morality.
@firetyger - I read the quote, and didn’t get the impression he was talking about the majority of business owners, I got the impression he was talking to the few who don’t give any credit to the people that contributed to the success of their business. The rest is what I consider a poorly worded reference to the interdependence of businesses.
For the record, I own a very small business, I give credit to the professors that taught me what I needed to know to be successful, the consumers that stick with me, the society that makes owning a business possible, etc. I know damn well I work my ass off to be successful, but I know I couldn’t do it alone. i think most business owners would agree with me.
@tendollar4ways - In other words, it takes a village. Where have we heard that primative commie pinko ideology before?
@mtngirlsouth - that is an ignorant thing to say. i don’t have accepted news sources. i’m not simple minded. in fact my IQ, i’m told, dwarfs that of Einstein. you stick to your reality. the thing is it is you who said Obama took credit for what the Navy Seals did when he did not. but he did make the decision many in the know called gutsy. it takes two to tango. had Obama not made that decision the Navy Seals would not have gone in and did what he believed they could do. Obama was right. others were wrong.
what morality are you speaking of? do you think it was immoral to have gotten the mastermind behind the 9/11 attack? i’m sorry but i was there when it happened and i have to disagree
or are you now mixing apples and oranges. Obama does not agree with your morality therefore nothing he does could possibly be right?
@mtngirlsouth - and as for party lines….i’m registered as an independent
@PrisonerxOfxLove - It puts the lotion in the basket!!! Go pray to Ayn Rand already will ya?
@SKANLYN - I wasn’t either. I’m the oldest of four kids, born into a one family income brought in by a cop who made $40k a year. My husband grew up in poverty. We currently have two small businesses, one in marketing and one my husband does as freelance on the side. On top of his main job as a programmer for Thomson Reuters. What kind of life you were born into has nothing to do with whether or not you can get a business started and off the ground.
@TheSutraDude - I do know the history of the internet, thanks to my hubby who since high school, has been an avid enthusiast of all things computer related and a programmer. I didn’t say that it’s a bad thing that the military allowed for it to become what it is today – the WWW, accessible to all, not just government but civilians and other governments. And yes, a large part of companies selling and designing products like Apple and Microsoft. I was simply pointing out that what Obama said wasn’t accurate.
The Health Care Law actually does raise taxes on businesses large and small alike. Considering it is forcing coverage or pay a tax. One of my husband’s former jobs was for a small start up company. They had six employees and health insurance wasn’t offered. Obamacare changes that. They have to cover their employees or get taxed. And for regular Americans who “make too much” according to government standards but not enough to pay for health insurance (or for those who are wealthy enough to just pay health bills as they go in), they too will be taxed each year for not having health insurance. Regardless of your income bracket, if you don’t buy yourself insurance, you get taxed.
I’m not a Republican so I’m not a fan of Romney or anything. Won’t be voting for him or Obama. The man is a disaster as far as how he ran his state of Massachusetts (which ironically had Romneycare before Obamacare and their health insurance costs rose significantly). And I’m not pleased with how he did business, either. Not that I’m against him having wealth. I just do not like his practices and lack of transparency. So you’re preaching to the choir here when it comes to him.
@xsimplepleasuresx - I guess we came away with very different interpretations. I’m a small business owner as well and I don’t believe that I am running a business because I’m smarter than most people or because I did it completely alone. The overall tone of his message just comes across as very condescending to me and I don’t appreciate it. We do work hard to run our businesses and I feel like he downplays the work it takes to run one.
@TheSutraDude - You sure are good at repeating their talking points. And for an Independent, you sure love to ALWAYS bring up what the republicans are saying to whatever your Obama lovefest for the moment is, even when no one else even mentioned it.
@firetyger - here is the thing though. people who cannot afford healthcare insurance will not be penalized. they will be given the option to be helped by the government to get healthcare coverage. small businesses will be given tax credits for supplying healthcare insurance to employees. yes this is taxpayer money but it is far more expensive for taxpayers to pay for someone without healthcare who shows up in an emergency room. under healthcare reform insurance companies are required to cut their bureaucracy or face reimbursing customers for using more of their customer’s premium money than is necessary. private healthcare bureaucracy is more costly than medicare bureaucracy. part of the reason is private healthcare pays people to find reasons not to cover people who have paid premiums, re preexisting conditions. how is it that we pay 50% personally more for healthcare than any other advanced nation?
i’m thinking any business owner who complains about rates not rising or in some cases lowering as opposed to rising 16% a year, anyone who complains about getting coverage even with a “preexisting condition” and able to get insured would have to be fiscally nuts
i’ve been in emergency rooms 3 times. all 3 times doctors later told me they were surprised i lived. two of those times they brought out “the cart”. i had health insurance all 3 times. would you rather i didn’t have health insurance and you would have paid for bringing me back to life? i can tell you it was expensive. if your answer is you would have let me die you’re not on the same page with doctors and nurses who take an oath to do whatever they can to heal.
@firetyger - So you happened to get lucky, all the more reason you should aknowledge that the fruits of your success don’t just belong to you. They belong to all of us as we made it possible. We just weren’t lucky enough to be “entrepreneurs” like you.
@mtngirlsouth - i think logically but you sure are good for taking up FOX talking points
@TheSutraDude - Yeah, that’s why I did a blog about how you can’t trust FOX. You are *so* smart. I’m done with you.
@SKANLYN - *facepalm*
I suggest just reading my comment to thesutradude. Yeah. Luck plays a part in it. Moreso does the support of my family, good employees, etc. But to say that other people have put the exact same amount of work into my business as I have? No. Just no.
@mtngirlsouth - yeah you are so smart too not willing to give Obama credit for getting Bin Laden. real smart. thank goodness you are not key to our national security and btw we also got, under Obama, the one man tagged to take over for Bin Laden without fanfare from the Obama administration. Bush and Cheney would have likely been dancing around on TV.
as for me being smart….did you tutor college students in astrophysics while you were still in high school. based on your logic i rather doubt it
@mtngirlsouth - and i wouldn’t mind your lack of logic and reasoning except you’re fucking with peoples’ lives based on your narrow minded opinion
@TheSutraDude - Back when my husband was working longer hours for less pay then he gets now, we were the inbetween people. People who made to much to get any government assistance for health care but not enough to be able to pay for a health care plan. Since then, my husband got a better job, one with health benefits. But during that time, we were without insurance for almost two years. Under the new law, we would have been taxed (the SCOTUS says it is a tax so that is what I’m going with) for not being able to afford coverage. Now, if we could have gotten away with not paying our car insurance, we could have paid for Tricare. But since in Minnesota you have to have car insurance, we were living paycheck to paycheck and couldn’t afford the health insurance.
There will still be people who can’t afford it. And like we saw with Romneycare, I don’t believe it will bring costs down. We need to go back to the drawing board.
As for letting you die? No, I wouldn’t let you die. The way our ER works currently is fine with me, just pay off the bills on a payment plan. That’s what we did when we were without coverage.
@firetyger - ok my healthcare bills for emergency room care would have been in the hundred of thousands. that’s not something most people would be able to pay off in a lifetime. i was brought back from the brink of death. as for car insurance i believe it too is necessary. what if i am in an accident caused by me because i was texting or talking on my cell and the other guy or girl is turned into a parapalegic or killed? this happens. it’s why i don’t take my cell out while i’m driving. it’s why i don’t tailgate but where i live now i see all kinds of idiots who do. i have more respect apparently for life than many Americans who think it’s more important to get where they’re going a minute or two sooner than they have for a child who might run out into the street. libertarians….not government speed limits. no government stop signs. oh…does a libertarian want those things? not truly libertarian are they?
the healthcare reform bill is not perfect but neither were many bills that passed through Congress. it’s something to build on though as we’ve done with other bills. it does bring costs down though. many small business owners have said so. they’ve said their bills were going up 16% a year. this year they didn’t see a raise and some say their bills went down a bit. how is that bad?
do you want to have a car accident without insurance? good luck spending the rest of your life paying for whatever happened out of pocket. good luck to the person, maybe you, trying to get reimbursed for damages
and oh the complaints from conservatives who would have to pay for my emergency room instances and my automobile accidents if i had any. no you can’t say you don’t want to carry insurance and expect others to pay if you complain you have to pay for the insurance of others
@TheSutraDude - I wasn’t arguing for or against car insurance. I was simply stating that because by law, I -have- to buy car insurance, my family at the time was unable to purchase health insurance. Makes sense, yes? There was nothing in our budget we could move around so we could buy health insurance. The one thing I would’ve substituted for health insurance was car insurance. But since I didn’t want to lose my ability to drive, yeah. As for libertarians wanting stop signs and speed limits not being truly libertarian, you’re thinking of anarchists. Which is the idea of libertarianism taken to an extreme. I am neither libertarian or anarchist. I’m a moderate with conservative and libertarian leanings. So where you were trying to go with all that, I’m not sure.
As for the cost of your bills, that is a lot of money. I’d like to see true health care reform so the bills are not nearly that high. I’ve probably told you this before in past comments but I really believe we could knock down costs through tort reform, removing the monopolies created by state lines for insurance companies and with big pharma. Forcing people to buy insurance doesn’t solve the problem of not being able to afford insurance. Going after the root of the problems that cause the high inflation is our best option for actually making insurance affordable.
I don’t want to let people die in Emergency Rooms. When people come in unconscious, without anyone with them, how are we to even ask them for an insurance card? You can’t. And I’d rather err on the side of life and treat them. And then charge them a bill afterwards, whatever that may be. Rather then say hmm, I can’t find his wallet with his insurance card so let’s toss him out the back door and let him die. No. I’d like to see costs come down. So even if you’re uninsured, you’re not in debt for the rest of your life. Insurance should be an optional thing. Doctor bills weren’t always so ridiculously high.
@TheSutraDude - This is what the Navy SEALs think of President Obama:
“The President has failed and he is jeopardizing the safety of our troops, their families and our National security for political gain.”
You can read the rest here: LINK
@TheSutraDude - The Internet was the product of a military project called DARPA. It’s purpose was to provide a communications network in the event of nuclear war.
Since the funding was military and the idea military, it doesn’t make any difference where the idea was developed.
I worked on secret projects for the military but my employer was private sector.
BTW, high IQ means that you do stupid, better, faster and more creatively than us normal people. I’m not trying to be insulting, it’s just that their is nothing sacred about high IQ where wisdom is concerned.
@firetyger - No they put in more work. In fact they generally do all the work while the owner collects the cash. As I said, business owners are pimps. They use their workers for their own personal gain.
@firetyger - costs have already come down under healthcare reform. is the healthcare reform bill perfect? no. it is ludicrous that healthcare reform was dubbed “Obamacare” in an attempt to demonize it. it was Congress that battled internally and hashed out the bill. i would have liked to have seen single payer put into place. it’s what Congress has but unfortunately republicans in Congress wouldn’t allow that option. there is a reason why the Congressional approval rating is and has been for nearly 2 years at a historical low, 10% as of a few days ago. under healthcare reform if someone cannot afford health insurance the government will subsidize it for that person so they can have health insurance. it is a less expensive option for all of us than for us to have to pay higher premiums in order to make up for the expense of the many who show up in emergency because they have no health insurance. insurance competing across state lines is no guarantee that prices will come down. pharmaceutical costs for example are through the roof in the U.S. the reality is corporations are not in the business of making life more affordable for people. they are in the business of making more money for themselves. Wall Street industry leaders, “competitors”, meet together quietly to decide and agree upon practices that will make themselves more profitable be it across State lines or international borders. in that sense they don’t really compete with one another but rather agree upon ways to benefit themselves collectively. they are not like mom and pop small businesses. in small towns where we have several hardware stores those stores will compete with one another for business by lowering prices and providing better service to their communities. were they corporations such as those on Wall Street they would do things differently like convene and decide to all raise their prices in unison. do they break laws by doing so? yes which is why they spend so much money on lobbying for deregulation. a few weeks ago there was a vote in Congress to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress. the NRA warned Congress it would score the vote, meaning anyone who voted against holding him in contempt would have it held against them when their reelection time comes. it was the NRA’s message that NRA money would go to their opponent.
as for libertarian vs. anarchy. you said yourself you only have libertarian leanings. not a true libertarian. i know libertarians who want government totally out of their lives and we hear it all the time in political speeches. the thing is they tend to want government when it benefits them personally. take Michelle Bachmann who calls everything government does “socialism”. the biggest socialist program in the U.S. comes in the form of farm subsidies and in 2009 Bachmann emailed the Obama administration to ask him not to propose cuts to farm subsidies. it just so happens her family’s farm received $800,000 in farm subsidies. take Eric Cantor who tried to block funding for FEMA assistance to the northeast after the hurricane last summer destroyed a tremendous amount of property and knocked power out to millions. however when his State was hit by disaster he was on the phone to FEMA because it was his ass on the line. take libertarian Rand Paul who went on television and argued for bringing back Jim Crow laws as a libertarian principal but later backed off after being hit with massive amounts of bad press over his defense of “no coloreds allowed” signs and such being once again allowed in windows of businesses. take Ron Paul, America’s libertarian darling who, as his proof of why FEMA should be dissolved, uses the example of the great flood in Galveston, Texas. he held that disaster up as a shining example because eventually communities in the area built a retaining wall to avoid another such tragedy. what he fails to mention is 800,000 people lost their lives in that flood and many more were displaced because there was no early warning system. he fails to mention that many lives and much property would likely have been saved if there had been an early warning system and massive amounts of help sent in the following days. but who cares Ron Paul. they were only human lives and none you knew personally.
i know real libertarians. they pride themselves on hoping government fails. they own guns in the belief they’ll be the Mel Gibsons in a post government Mad Max world. trouble is i don’t see any of them sticking to their principals and leaving “socialist” America to set up tents in Somalia where there is no government to speak of. i can’t say i blame them.
@firetyger - as i believe i pointed out earlier, the individual mandate is a conservative idea. it came out of The Heritage Foundation during the Clinton years in opposition to the plan proposed by Hilary. it was implemented in Massachusetts under then Governor Romney who called it a mandate for people to take personal responsibility. it’s funny how the individual mandate idea became evil in the eyes of conservatives after Obama said, okay let’s go with your idea.
It doesn’t take a lot of intelligence or hard work to simply take a quote out of context and end it before he explains what he’s saying.
What he was actually saying was perfectly valid and was akin to albert einstein’s quote “If I have seen far it is only because I have stood on the shoulders of giants”.
He was making a statement about humility and liars for profit turned it into a “self absorbed” comment. Then you gobbled up the steaming pile of horseshit whole.
Bless this post.
@WaitingToShrug - How is it wrong to say that nobody succeeds or accomplishes anything by themselves in a vacuum?
@Somefishytales - I don’t think he’d disagree with you on that in the slightest. Why do you think that would be a burn or a gotcha?
@imTHEmeowMIXcat - I knew sutradude would see through the BS (he always seems to) but thanks for seeing through it too – gives me hope for humanity when people don’t mindlessly go along with lies.
@justfinethanku - So go live in a shack in the woods. You don’t need anybody or anything else, just yourself, right? You go be a nation of one and see how well you do.
@firetyger - I don’t think you’re getting out of the quote what was actually said. He isn’t talking about communist collectives or everyone having a business, he was just saying that no one gets anywhere without help whether they realize it or not. And many people like the OP do feel that way. Obama didn’t say all business owners do, he said that many do. And I don’t think he meant that making money was the motive for the internet, I took it as saying that it enabled companies to make money off of it. Ie “the sun came up this morning so I can see” does not imply that the sun came up out of concern for my vision.
@mtngirlsouth - How do you figure that?
@agnophilo - No Mark,I think you are wrong.I think he thinks he deserves being where he is and HE got there because he thinks that highly of himself.
@agnophilo - Mark,when you take what Obama said and then put it with all his actions and things he is trying to do,it is not taking ANYTHING out of context as to what he said in that statement.Do you think in Rush Limbaugh saying he wanted America to fail when he said he hoped Obama failed?You took him out of context then.And he was right,Obama HASN’T failed and because of that America has failed.So Rush was right yet again.
@Somefishytales - I think you’re reading (or writing) between the lines. What he’s saying he explicitly applies to himself saying “we” throughout the speech. He ends the thought with:
“So we say to ourselves, ever since the founding of this country, you
know what, there are some things we do better together. That’s how we
funded the GI Bill. That’s how we created the middle class. That’s how
we built the Golden Gate Bridge or the Hoover Dam. That’s how we
invented the Internet. That’s how we sent a man to the moon. We rise
or fall together as one nation and as one people, and that’s the reason
I’m running for President — because I still believe in that idea.
You’re not on your own, we’re in this together.”
He simply isn’t saying what you’re taking it as him saying. I think your interpretation is based on the way the conservative media caricatures him – but that isn’t accurate. He is by no means perfect, but he’s never struck me as being an egomaniac or condescending. I have though seen countless smears like this blog that distort a sensible comment or take it out of context to turn it into something sinister.
Please quote me where in the speech he says that he succeeded on his own and nobody else did. He just doesn’t say that. He said we can’t succeed without the efforts of people who built america – do you think he thinks he built america? He is saying we don’t succeed without teachers – do you think he thinks he didn’t have an education?
@agnophilo - Mark,I don’t want to think Obama meant it the way it sounded.But seeing policies he thinks will be best for America makes me wonder.Fox News and other conservative shows are just showing you actions the reg news will NOT because they don’t want to hurt their guy and their cause,simple as that.It’s all politics and to me all politics is is acting,it isn’t real.Real is what you do,not what you SAY you will do.
@Somefishytales - The one area america is failing in is our economy and that was spiraling downward when obama got elected. To hold him responsible for the bad economy is like holding you responsible for something that happened before you were born, it’s just not reasonable at all. And you’re basically saying that this dishonest, inaccurate smear isn’t valid by itself, but combined with countless other smears it’s valid.
The speech in question is twisted into something it isn’t, just like every other word that comes out of the man’s mouth. I don’t understand how conservatives can keep going back to sources that lie to them and twist the facts – unless they want to believe them for some other reason.
@agnophilo - You honestly don’t think the liberal news media lies?I guess thats what its come down to,which lies do we believe huh? Why can’t news just be reported with no sarcasm or anything,just report what happened.News today has become 90% comantary and 10% actual news I think.It’s hard to tell what is news and what is just an opinion of the news.Thats my beef with ALL of the news media!
@Somefishytales - What policies are those?
And fox news has created a legal precedence allowing news organizations to not only lie to the public, but legally fire anchors for refusing to lie. They fired some of their employees for refusing to lie and then went to court to defend their right to misinform the public under the first amendment (claiming corporate personhood and saying that not letting them lie was violating their civil rights). (link) They lie about the president more than anyone not because he’s a batman villain, but because they know no sitting president is going to sue a news network while in office. So even though slander is illegal, they know they can get away with it. Do you think this is journalism?
Or glenn beck claiming americorps (the domestic equivalent of the peace corps, volunteer organization that helps clean up communities etc) is obama’s personal military army comparable to the waffen SS or saddam hussein’s personal guard and that obama gave them 500 billion dollars to arm themselves so they could take on the real army? Is that journalism? Or is that lying for profit?
@Somefishytales - “You honestly don’t think the liberal news
media lies?”
No, I think they do. I think they more often simply fail to criticize both parties evenly, their lies are more often lies of omission. Fox news more commonly makes things up out of whole cloth. I am not partisan, you’ll not see me defending MSNBC.
“I guess thats what its come down to,which lies do we believe
huh?”
I’d rather you just fact-check the lies and believe the truth (whatever it is).
“Why can’t news just be reported with no sarcasm or anything,just
report what happened.News today has become 90% comantary and 10% actual
news I think.It’s hard to tell what is news and what is just an opinion
of the news.Thats my beef with ALL of the news media!”
I agree 100%. News shows also repeat made up stories, sometimes for weeks or months without getting the facts first – it’s a consequence of the 24 hour news cycle. When there was just a news hour or half hour they could spend all day fact checking, now it’s just a rumor mill where everyone climbs over themselves to break “news” first. But it isn’t news any more it’s gossip. The ACORN child prostitution thing was a total invention and it took me about an hour to find proof of it online. It took about a month after that for the news media to catch on. The “fast and furious” story that every network ran with for weeks, claiming our government sold guns to mexican drug cartels? Total bullshit. In reality they just had criminals under surveillance who were selling guns, and couldn’t seize the weapons for lack of evidence (because unlike drugs, guns themselves aren’t illegal).
The news media reports half-truths and lies, and honestly fox is worse than the rest put together. There are shows that are just as full of shit on other networks (that ed guy is as bad as o’reilly) but the worst lie of any other network pales in comparison to the BS fox news has not just repeated, but actually come up with over the years.
@agnophilo - Everyone has opinions,I guess it depends on the mindset.I will admit,you have a pretty brilliant mind Mark.I wish I could use mine the way you do only I would want to remember,it’s a human mind and it does make mistakes.
@Somefishytales - Thank you for the compliment : ) And I know I’m not perfect, and I am critical of my own views too. I just did two blogs about intelligent design which treated the subject in a very fair-minded way.
And my mind is human and isn’t perfect, but as opposed to what? Rush Limbaugh isn’t human? Or do you think god tells you fox news is telling the truth?
I’m not being snarky, I’m really wondering what you’re implying.
@SKANLYN – The problem with your theory is that the business owner takes all of the risk in the company. Employees do not. Like I said, you would understand that being a business owner is not just about sitting on your butt and collecting money if you had experience in business. Sure, illegal prostitution rings and drug cartels are a bit different. But I’m not talking about that. I’m talking about your average, run of the mill business.
@agnophilo - Oh,I think Fox news has an agenda just like all of the news media,it just happens to be a view I agree with and thats the difference I guess.As far as snarky LOL,I’ve gotten over people appearing that way on the internet.I take snarkyness or what have you with a grain of salt now that I’ve been on here a while.It used to bother me but as I look at it,people don’t know me and how I think,my daily things I have to deal with so I just know they have no clue what they are talking about when they may get “snarky” with me LOL.Rush Limbaugh and the likes just say things I agree with (even tho I might not always care for their approach in how they portay it) I still agree with the point they are making.
@SKANLYN - my father was born into poverty. He started two businesses by time he was 30. An auto shop and a farm. He gave back with the low cost of his services. His farm gave back with food. So stop the bullshit of companies needing to “give back.” If you don’t think they give back already, then give up your salary, and everything you have ever purchased from any company, because you are, quite simply, completely full of shit.
@agnophilo – The problem is, the sense in which Obama is talking about business owners not doing it on their own is not the same sense in which business owners will speak of doing things on their own. I will say that my husband and I built our own business together on our own. However, that doesn’t mean I believe we did it on our own in the sense that we did it without driving on public roads, education, etc. It took personal initiative, personal investment, risks, and the ability to put together a viable business and to successfully market it to the desired audience. No one else did that for me and my husband. We had to do that by ourselves. Which is the part that business owners do claim, and rightfully so, to have done on their own. Now we also believe that it takes luck, support, and good customers and/or employees to run a successful business. None of us believe we run our businesses truly alone when it comes to that part of it. Make sense?
I hope I explained this well enough. I’m a bit tired this afternoon.
@TheSutraDude – So you’re saying the individual mandate was a Republican idea. I’m not a Republican. And I don’t believe forcing people to buy something is the answer. It’s not ‘personal responsibility’ to say we’re going to ignore the root problem of what causes health care to be so unaffordable in the first place and instead just force people by law to buy it or else tax those who already can’t buy it for whatever reason. It’s a nonsensical solution to the problem.
The song coming out of the camp of Obama worshippers is “He didn’t actually mean THAT” (THAT being exactly what he said) “he meant…” (something else.) As pissed off as those of us who’ve worked morning to night for years to build businesses while 20% of the population does, literally, absolutely nothing to contribute to their own or anyone else’s survival are, if Obama didn’t mean exactly what he said, he’d have clarified it by now.
He’s the worst collectivist I’ve ever seen. And I observe that he’s never built anything himself, so he may actually believe everything comes into existence by “someone else” building it.
In all other universes, Obama is a crack-addicted welfare whore. Wonder how we got stuck in this one.
@TheSutraDude – Do you have an article link or something that discusses how health care costs have come down? Reports that I’ve read from the Congressional Budget Office said that prices would rise under Obamacare. As for competition across state lines not working, how so? The more competitors you have, the more you have to adjust your services to remain viable. I do believe that if our government stopped pandering to big Pharma and made it legal for Americans to say, buy their medication from Canada if they wanted to, we would see change in costs of medication. It would take that and the dismantling of the monopoly big Pharma currently has.
I’m against the government subsidizing businesses and bailing businesses out. It’s one of the reasons why I don’t care for neo-cons like Michelle. It’s why I’m against the government owning GM and then being GM’s best customer. Making taxpayers pay for the company and then continuously purchase from themselves… It’s bad business. Same with the U.S. Postal Service being paid for with taxpayer money and operating at a loss. A real business could never stay viable under such conditions because it’s bad business. Our government shouldn’t be a part of promoting that.
@firetyger - yes it was a republican idea. people who cannot purchase insurance will not be taxed. they’ll be helped out financially so they can purchase it. only those who can afford it but refuse to will be taxed.the mandate does make sense. it will help bring insurance costs down for all. it has already begun to do so and many parts of the reform have yet to kick in. why it makes sense is if i can afford insurance but refuse to pay for it, then i get sick or i’m in an accident my recourse is to go to an emergency room. since i cannot pay guess who will? the rest of Americans who are paying their premiums will pay my way by way of their premiums going up. doctors, hospital staff, pharma companies and insurance companies are not going to pay my way. the costs are passed on to consumers. this has been happening for decades.
there is a clause in the reform bill that states penalties against people who don’t buy insurance cannot be enforced. i don’t know however if that changes since the Supreme Court decided the penalty is a tax and not a fine but if it hasn’t changed even if you are asked to pay a tax because you can afford insurance but refuse to buy it, you don’t have to pay the tax and nobody can come after you. this clause was insisted upon by liberals in Congress. i’m not sure i agree with it but there it is.
@firetyger - i have to go but quickly, the government does not own GM. it rescued the American auto industry with a loan which has been paid back. GM is back on top, run as a private company and is making better cars than ever. i’ve read from the CBO the reform bill will bring down the deficit by $1 trillion in 10 years. i’ve heard many small business owners say their employee insurance costs have not only stopped going up by 16% a year as they were but have leveled out and some have seen reduction in coverage costs.
thanks for chatting. i have to run
@blonde_apocalypse - Nice to see you writing in your usual, exquisite form.
@ANVRSADDAY - Not everybody appreciates me like you do, Frank.
@blonde_apocalypse - I will always admire you.
@Somefishytales - My point is that they lie. Facts are not a matter of opinion. No comment on the examples of egregious distortions I gave? How can you keep trusting people who deliberately lie over and over and over again?
@firetyger - So then what’s wrong with what obama said?
@firetyger - The individual mandate is a solution to the problem of insurance companies denying people coverage when they get sick, especially for pre-existing conditions, which prevents not just the uninsured, but tons of people with insurance from getting access to healthcare. And it is a big part of the problem, it’s why emergency rooms are inefficiently treating people they’re not equipped to treat who can’t get help anywhere else with or without insurance. It’s just like our education system, elementary schools and highschools suck, so colleges act as remedial schools. And taxing people more who don’t do something isn’t anything new, you get taxed more for not being married, having kids, giving to charity and a thousand other things. It’s only an outrage when a democrat does it.
@blonde_apocalypse -
“The song coming
out of the camp of Obama worshippers is “He didn’t actually mean THAT”
(THAT being exactly what he said) “he meant…” (something else.)”
No, the song coming out of people who read the context is “read what he actually said”.
“As
pissed off as those of us who’ve worked morning to night for years
to build businesses while 20% of the population does, literally,
absolutely nothing to contribute to their own or anyone else’s survival
are,”
How do you figure that? And unemployment is high because of market forces, do you think people just spontaneously became lazy in droves when the economy crashed?
“if Obama didn’t mean exactly what he said, he’d have clarified it
by now.”
What he said was never un-clear, just taken out of context.
“He’s the worst collectivist I’ve ever seen. And I
observe that he’s never built anything himself, so he may actually
believe everything comes into existence by “someone else” building it.”
You’re literally saying that someone who grew up poor but still went to harvard law on partial scholarships and student loans, then paid them off when he wrote two best-selling books, became a state senator, then US senator and then became the first non-white president in US history (just before winning the nobel prize) hasn’t accomplished anything? Yeah, if only he’d been an accountant who remodeled mansions then his parents would have something to be proud of…
In what universe has he not made more of himself than 99% of americans?
“In all other universes, Obama is a crack-addicted welfare whore. Wonder how we got stuck in this one.”
Why don’t you just come right out and call him a nigger?
@firetyger - If I recall the CBO said costs would continue to rise (they were rising sharply) then decline. Bear in mind it takes several years for many of the provisions in the bill to kick in.
@firetyger - the fact that he thinks a business owner is no different then a drug dealer proves that he has the entrepreneurial brains of a toad! He couldn’t work 5 minutes with my 83 year old father who can barely read and started out far far poorer then the false poverty this part time clock puncher pleads. Yet my father worked 24/7 for 50 years. His employees got paid well but they get to go home after 40 hours. My father almost got a divorce for being a workaholic to keep his business surviving through tough times and that gave him a heart attack. The “stress” of part time 40 hour clock pusher. Cry me a self righteous parasite river.
@LadyboyRevolution - Who thinks a business owner is no different than a drug dealer?
@firetyger - What risk is that? You own the business so you’re already set financially. Your workers are the ones having to worry about you sending their jobs to India.
@grim_truth - Gave back with his low cost for service? Are you for fucking real? That attitude is the precisereason why I have no respect for business owners.
@SKANLYN - Financially set? When you first get started with a business, you’re footing your own money and there is no guarantee that your business will actually bring in income or succeed. You’re basically working in the hole from day one and you have to figure out a way to market your product and sell so you can at some point start bringing in profit. Start-up costs can be immense and it’s a huge risk. People have lost entire fortunes trying to get a business off the ground and failing. Besides the fact that there are upkeep costs for your equipment, employee salaries, employee benefits, bookkeeping, etc. You also have to pay hefty taxes along with paying off loans if you took out loans to get started. Business growth generally means you have to invest your own money and/or take out more loans. If the market dips or your business tanks, you can LOSE EVERYTHING. And losing your business doesn’t make your loans or other financial obligations go away. It means you have to find a job -and- figure out how to pay off loans and taxes on a business that no longer exists and brings in zero income. At that point the business owner can end up having all of their assets confiscated like their vehicle and home if they can’t make payments because they’re drowning from the loss of their business.
@agnophilo - We’ve discussed this before. Taxing people’s income on a rate based on their marital status, giving, and dependents is not taxing them for non-behavior. You’re taxing their income – them working a job. The rate simply changes based on other financial factors in your life.
Getting taxed for not buying health insurance is like getting taxed for not buying a pack of gum or any other product. Which is ridiculous.
@agnophilo - http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/finance/2012/March/CBO-Report-Obamacare-More-Costly-than-Promised/
@firetyger - And taxing someone who doesn’t have health insurance isn’t taxing their income? That argument was nonsensical the first time you made it and it still is.
@firetyger - First of all CBN isn’t a credible source for news. I recently did a blog about a totally insane, paranoid, blatantly false and racist conspiracy theory they presented as fact. Here it is if you want to read it. Second, the article claims many things that are just false like that 20 million people are going to be dumped from their insurance as a result of the healthcare bill according to the CBO when the CBO report doesn’t say that, doesn’t contain that figure anywhere and actually says there will be a slight change in the number of people with employer-based insurance due to the actions of employers and employees, and what this means is not a loss of health insurance but the ability to pick your own insurance instead of being stuck with whatever your employer picks.
They say the cost of insurance will go up but this is to be expected, much of the reforms haven’t even kicked in yet and costs were rapidly increasing (which was the point of the reforms). The sharp rise (over 10% annually) isn’t going to stop on a dime before the bill even comes into effect. The article is just repeating the spin from conservative think-tanks, and it even cites the heritage foundation (which invented the notion of the individual mandate then attacked it by the way).
http://www.aei-ideas.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/sand1.jpg
@SKANLYN - NO ONE in the county could beat his prices. He barely made a profit. Which is why it never fully took off as a full time business and why he never got rich from it. However, it’s YOUR attitude that is more fucking selfish than any I’ve ever seen. Again, unless you give back any and all salary you have EVER made, and give back any product that you have EVER needed and been able to purchase, you are the one who is full of absolute shit. It’s almost funny how you always manage to ignore the fact that you indeed get more from the rich than you give to them. And you have the nerve to call them greedy and hate them.
Your arguments are weak and fucking ridiculous. How does a restaurant or hardware store send jobs to India? Have you ever started a business? No one gets rich by magically shitting money, which is what you seem to think. Most rich people aren’t even born rich. Most of the rich follks in the US made their money from investments. Not from inheritance, not from CEO salaries, not from robbing people. Investments. But of course, you’ll ignore the truth because it just doesn’t fit your argument. Just as you try to claim that all business owners are rich, when they are far from it. If you want to see the economy, government, etc improve, you need to argue that folks as ignorant as you shouldn’t be allowed to vote. I think that is more startling than any tyrannical gov’t program.
@stuartandabby - Read my comments, not what he said.
@agnophilo - I really don’t understand how you can be so intellectually dishonest about this. Taxing someone for not having health insurance isn’t about taxing them for having a job – it’s taxing them for not buying health insurance. It’s not the same thing at all.
@firetyger - A tax is a tax. Taxes based on personal choices are nothing new. All taxes whether they be based on marital status, how much you give to charity or healthcare etc tax income. What exactly is the distinction? And nowhere have I been intellectually dishonest.
@agnophilo - No, not all taxes are the same. That is why we have:
Death Tax
Income Tax
Property Tax
etc.
These are all taxes for different things. Now how you pay for them is with your own money, yes. But only your income tax is specifically for taxing your income. To try to pretend otherwise -is- being intellectually dishonest.
@firetyger - What, in the name of all that is good and holy, is your point?
@agnophilo - Are you serious? Or are you just trolling?
Income Tax is taxing your income. The Death Tax taxes your death, Property Tax taxes you for owning a home, etc. Those are all behaviors or actions you took. The inaction of not buying something, i.e. not buying health insurance, is not like our other taxes.
@firetyger - Again, you pay more taxes for not getting married, not having kids, not giving to charity and a million other things.